ReferenceLoading the volume
ReferenceLoading the volume
No. 07Deal Structure
Also called JV deal, profit-share deal, joint venture agreement
Artist and label co-own the recordings and split net profits after costs are recovered.
Neutral
Structure is inherently fairer than royalty deals, but outcome depends heavily on how 'costs' are defined.
A joint venture deal replaces the traditional royalty structure with shared ownership. Both parties contribute (the artist provides recordings, the label provides funding and distribution), costs are deducted first, and net profits are split, often 50/50. The artist retains a meaningful ownership stake.
JV deals are more transparent than royalty deals because you share in actual profits rather than receiving a royalty percentage on a negotiated base. The risk: if the definition of 'costs' is broad, profits may never materialise.
The same clause is drafted three ways. These are the positions we see, worst first, so you can tell at a glance which one is in front of you.
The drafting language and the negotiation moves for this clause are part of the workspace.
You have read what the clause means and where the risk sits. The rest is the side-by-side of how it reads when it is against you and when it is not, plus the specific moves that get it there.